Wednesday, 20 August 2025

 YOUR EPISTEMOLOGY/


YOUR EMBODIMENT

 

Because the word "epistemology" sounds academic, it's easy to fall into the
trap of thinking that  epistemology, and specifically your epistemology
about anything in particular, is merely intellectual or academic.  Yet in
reality it is not!  Instead, your epistemology determines how you experience
life in your body. 

 

Why is that?  Because when you think, you think ideas, and your ideas
inevitably get located in your body.  This ideo-dynamic or ideo-motor aspect
of your mind-body system describes how you are a neuro-semantic and
neuro-linguistic being.  That means that "as you think, so you feel."  As
you think, so you activate the motor cortex in your brain which then sends
messages to your body.  In the end, you embody those ideas and experience
them kinesthetically.

 

Nor is this new.  You already know that depending on what you're thinking,
and how you're thinking, so you will feel and experience.  That's why you
can think about all sorts of problems that could happen in the future
(otherwise called 'worrying') and if you do it long enough and with enough
intensity-you can make yourself sick with worry.  You can create headaches,
migrains, upset stomach, even ulcers.  Isn't that amazing?  You have the
ability to embody your worrying thoughts so your body bears the blunt of
those thoughts.

 

The principle that I'm getting at is this: As you think, and the way you
know what you know, determine the emotional states and the physiological
states you experience.  Your epistemology -your embodiment.  Your
epistemology-your emotions.

 

Now let's get personal.  What are you embodying?  What is deceptive about
this process is that it takes time.  The feedback from your body regarding
the way you're thinking does not happen immediately although you can speed
it up.  Add a lot of very intense emotions (fear, anger, sadness, etc.) to
an idea and you can more quickly get yourself into a physiological state.
Robbins does this in his fire walks.  He adds massive desire, passion, and
excitement to get people into physiological states where they walk on hot
coals.

 

But normally, it takes weeks, months, even years for your way of thinking to
result in psycho-somatic illnesses and diseases.  This is what makes the
process deceptive and what prevents us from gaining awareness of what we are
doing to ourselves via our thoughts.  Yet embodiment, as a process, is
inevitable.  It is what the body does.  Your body, and mine, takes thoughts
and translates them into a kinesthetic code.  What results are our emotions,
emotional states, attitudes (disposition of body), and the well-being or the
ill-being in terms of our body functions.

 

Here is something that I think should cause all of us to pause and deeply
consider what we are doing to ourselves via our thoughts.  Ultimately, the
way you think and know (your epistemology) becomes incorporated in your
body.

           To what extent do you think fearful, apprehensive, dreadful
thoughts?

           To what extent do you think angry and aggressive thoughts during
the day?

           To what extent do you think sad, depressive, and fatalistic
thoughts?

           To what extent do you think in terms of competition, win and
lose?

           To what extent do you think in terms of envy and jealous of
others?

 

Another subtle factor of our thinking that leads to undesirable embodiment
is the kind of thinking you do all day.  Years ago I did a public
demonstration of coaching with a person who had been brought in from the
outside, who knew nothing of NLP or Meta-Coaching.  I began by asking what
he wanted to accomplish which was important to him and he told me what he
did not want.  I asked, "When you don't have X, what will you have?"  He
again told me more of what he did not want.  That repeated 4 or 5 times.
Ah, a pattern!  I asked, "What is your job or career?"  It turned out he did
quality control on airplanes.

"So all day long the kind of thinking you do is looking for what's wrong,
what you don't want, what should not be there.  Is that right?"

"Yes, that's right." 

"Well, now I know your problem and the solution. ... [long pause during
which he began to look increasingly interested] It is your best day-time
thinking that is now preventing you from enjoying your life.  Your looking
for what you don't want has been so strong, so embodied, that you feel stuck
and unable to change it.  If you'd like to change that-that would be your
solution."

 

What does this mean for you and me?  It means that the way you think all day
(or a good part of the day) can become a thinking habit which prevents you
from doing other kinds of thinking.  The solution is becoming aware of your
thinking habit and then thinking-about-your-thinking chose when it is useful
and when it is not.  All that requires is just some basic "mind" training.

 

 

 

 

Monday, 4 August 2025

 BELIEFS AND


THE HOUSE OF MEANING

 

A long, long time ago in a century before this one, Bob and I worked out the
actual structure of beliefs and we discover something stupendous for the
field of NLP.  Namely, the structure of beliefs is not based in
sub-modalities.  In spite of what almost every one in NLP believes and
teaches, beliefs are not made out of the editorial features of your movies.

 

This is in spite of Bandlers straw-man argument about " believing the sun
will rise tomorrow."  The reason that represents a false argument is that
when there is a belief -there is also the possibility of a  belief's
reverse.  If you believe, "I can't learn something complex,' the opposite
belief is "I can learn something complex."  What would be the opposite of
believing the sun will rise tomorrow?  The sun will not rise?  And who
believes that?  No one!  And that's why it is a pseudo-example.

 

Further Bandler got it wrong when he said that beliefs can be single images.
Beliefs are statements- sentences that assert something.  Accordingly we
have beliefs that assert all sorts of things:

           Identity beliefs: "I believe that I am a wealth creator." [These
are also complex-equivalence beliefs: "I believe that rolling your eyes
backwards means you think X is ridiculous."]

           Quality beliefs: "I believe I am thoughtful and charming."

           Capacity beliefs: "I believe I can resiliently bounce back from
a set-back."

           Causation beliefs: "I believe that rejection causes me to feel
upset."

           Time beliefs: "I believe there's never enough time."

           Existence beliefs: "I believe that fairies really exist."

 

Notice that these sentences are asserting something about some aspect of
reality.  That's what a belief is.  It is not just a single image like the
run rising.  In Sub-Modalities Going Meta (1997/ 2005) Bob and I illustrated
by using Hitler.  "Do you believe that Hitler was a good person?"  I hope
you emphatically say "No, hell no."  Bandler's approach would be to upgrade
your visual image of Hitler changing the sub-modalities so that they
represent how you represent what's real.  Make the picture bigger, brighter,
put a smile on Aldoph's face, erase the moustache, etc.   Now is there
anything you can do to your pictures and sounds so that you actually start
to believe that he is a good man?  Of course, the answer is no.  That's
because no matter how good you make him look, in the back of your mind you
say, "No, he murdered millions of people."

 

What Bob and I worked out was that the structure of a belief involves
confirming your first thought.  We identified that it is the confirming
process itself that transforms a thought or idea into a 'belief.'  And how
do we confirm?  What evidence is required to confirm?  The answer to that
question is almost any evidence that a person so chooses to use.  He may use
authority, repetition, emotion, experience, reading it in a book, hearing it
from someone he respects, etc.  The confirming process involves essentially
saying that the original thought or idea is right, good, actual, and/or
real.  Do that and your second thought which confirms transforms the first
thought into a belief.

 

Today that structure lies at the heart of the Meta-State Belief Change
pattern using "yes" and "no" as the summary expressions that confirm or
dis-confirm a thought.  Yet that explanation, by itself, is only a basic
description.  Today as we make a much deeper dive into the structure of a
belief, we recognize that a belief is a two-or-more-layered structure, first
a primary level thought then a meta-thought about it.  The second thought is
a conclusion drawn about the first.

                                           Meta-Thought:   Doing my best is
how I create self-worth.

Thought:             I believe I need to be the best to get approval.

 

You can confirm a thought (or idea) in so many ways.  When you think any
second thought about the first, it confirms it by treating it as real.  For
example, you an confirm its value, your memory of it, what you anticipate
from the statement, what you understand, your identity, decision, intention,
etc.  While we can view each of these as additional meta-levels, we can also
recognize them as beliefs.  A value is what you believe is important.  A
memory is what you believe that you recall.  An anticipation is what you
believe you can forecast will happen in the future.  A decision is what you
believe is the best choice, and so on.  It's beliefs all the way up.
Everything in the Meta Place and every possible higher logical level or
meta-level is a belief.

 

In this way, you confirm any multi-layered idea as a belief.  For you, it is
true, actual, and real.  It certainly seems real because your experience
seems to validate it.  As you think in this way so you believe and your
belief then functions as if a program informing your nervous systems how to
live it.  In this, you live your beliefs because you embody them.  You feel
this and you act from this, you 'see' (perceive') frm this (which creates
your meta-programs).  In this way your belief becomes self-reinforcing- a
self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

Each belief becomes a house of meaning which you then live in.  Now you can
ask a series of questions to test a belief and/or develop a belief.  Do that
with the thought above, "I believe I need to be the best to get approval."

           So you believe this?  For how long have you believed this? 

           What are the results from believing this?

           Do you want to believe this?  If you did not believe this, what
would be the reverse that you'd like to believe?

 

It's beliefs all the way up.  These multi-layered ideas may or may not be
true.  What matter is that you treat it as if it were true and it
determinates your behavior.  It generates results in your emotions and
actions.  Ask, "What difference does the belief make in your actions?"  If
there is no difference, then there is no meaning, it is merely academic.  If
there is a difference, then what difference?

           Is that what you want to do?  What would you rather do instead
of that?

           What do you need to believe so that you can do that?

 

References

1. See the articles on Beliefs in the Neurons Series 2011, "Beliefs as
Sentences," "Belief Structures," "Sentences You Feel as Convictions," and
"Sentences Systemic in Nature." Also in the book Sub-Modalities Going Meta.

 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.